There is a misconception in the romance world that male authors cannot write with genuine emotion as effectively as women can. I’ve seen more than a few comments from readers, critics, and academics alike that reinforce this idea. The problem is that this notion stems from a number of erroneous and misleading notions concerning what men do, how they think, and how they behave.
Men themselves aren’t much help in this arena. Most guys wouldn’t be caught dead reading a romance novel, and if they were, they’d harrumph and conjure up some bullshit story about trying to figure out why women like this stuff. They’d certainly never own up to reading romance for their own pleasure or entertainment, and the idea of actually writing romance? Insane!
What the romance reader needs to remember is that men are trapped by their ascribed gender roles just as much as women are. Men don’t want to deal with the stigma of being “less than manly” any more than women want to be labeled as “sluts.” Both of these tags set my teeth on edge the more I think about them, if you want to know the honest truth. I’ve come to the point where I put the word “straight” in quotation marks just because I don’t feel my own sexual bias is any more or less correct than anyone else’s, and if I’m “straight,” then someone who’s bi or gay must be “crooked.” Sorry, not buying it, or the lines of crap that radiate from it.
Now that I’ve set up the basic argument, I’m going to put a polish on it by pointing out some things a lot of men would really rather I didn’t. I don’t expect you to take my word for any of this, gentle reader. Instead, try it out for yourself. Ask your lover about these points yourself, or better yet, don’t ask. Observe him when you do certain things and see what he does. Bet you a year’s pay I’m right all down the line. (If I’m not, as regards your current flame, you might want to think about finding yourself a new one. Just sayin’.)
Guys don’t always like being the sexual aggressors. (Because this word has such negative connotations, I might better say “initiators.” Yeah…that works.) Men like to know that their woman still wants them around for more than just opening jars, keeping the light bill paid, and fixing that godawful rattling coming from under the hood of the car. What guys find seductive may not necessarily be what turns you on, but ask yourself this: Do you honestly think most guys will put on Ten Things I Hate About You, which just so happens to be your favorite movie, on their own? Not likely, ladies.
The point is that men want to be appreciated and cared for just as much as you do. Happiness for a man does not solely consist of a full stomach, an empty scrotum, and watching Sons of Guns on Discovery. In our own more than a little dysfunctional way, aided and abetted by five thousand years of clueless eggheads telling us how the sexes ought to behave, we like emotional intimacy and to know our women still find us sexually desirable just as much as women do.
So this raises the question of what it takes to seduce a man.
This is tricky, because all men don’t roll out of the factory tuned to a certain set of specs. Some men enjoy lingerie, while some (ahem *points vaguely to self*) regard it as an expensive and nice-looking waste of time and effort. The fact is the window dressing doesn’t really matter. Most men, and I can absolutely iron-clad guarantee this, would rather see their woman wrapped up in a $5 Wal-Mart towel than a $300 lingerie set from Victoria’s Secret. (And by the way: I don’t know if anyone’s told Victoria, but her secret’s out.)
Here’s the key: Communicate. Ask your man what’s romantic to him. Erotic and romantic aren’t necessarily the same thing, either. Many people of both genders make the mistake of thinking that romance automatically equals sex. Romantic can mean something as simple as passing him a wrench.
I don’t pretend to be able to speak to why all men write romance, but in my case I write it because I enjoy both sex and love. If love is the emotional expression of desire for another person, then sex and physical intimacy must be equally important. I’ve always believed love, and writing, are both magickal in the finest and truest sense of the word. It’s that magick that I try to bring to my work for my readers. And, hey…if it results in two (or more) people enjoying each other’s bodies and company, and maybe developing a deeper understanding of each other, then for my money that’s even better.
A huge thanks to Mary Winter for allowing me to come by and clutter up the place today! I promise I’ll sweep up the cigarette butts before I leave. As a thank you to you wonderful readers, I’m giving away an e-copy of any book on my backlist except Seductress and A Light In The Darkness, along with an absolutely free, never-been-seen before short story called “Make A Wish!” Thanks for coming by, y’all. Leave a comment to win!
Until next time,
Best,
J.S. Wayne





I love it. I wish more men would be honest with themselves on how the feel in regards to romanace.
It would be be great if we could be, Chris. There are a lot of reasons, ranging from societal to deeply personal, why it’s not that easy…but if one guy can stand up and do it, maybe he’ll inspire two. And those two will each inspire two. And one day, we’ll wake up and everyone will have gotten a clue. But it starts with one person.
Great post J.S. and guys should not be so afraid of being “unmanly”.
Thanks, Phuong! I couldn’t agree more.
Dear J.S., Hi! Interesting article. Why is it that we all cannot communicate perfectly? Babies do it! Seems the longer we’re here, the more we mess up! I hope school is going well for you! I see that you haven’t posted your grades.
I’m sure you’re acing it! Hugs, Mary
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:57:25 +0000 To: maryharrisauthor@hotmail.com
Hi, Mary!
The more I think about it, the more convinced I am that babies understand the world better than we do. Sure, adults are more educated, but kids don’t have preconceived notions of this or that. They just see what is.
Can’t post my grades just yet…but be looking for that next week. I’ve got three finals to clear out, two of which I’m taking today!
Take care!
Great post J.S. I know you guys can be every bit as emotional and romance-oriented as we can, but most won’t admit it because of that *manly* thing you were talking about. I love reading male-written romances just as much as female-written. Sure men and women are differnent in a lot of ways, but we’re all human–I think.
Oh, and as for Ten Things I Hate About You; my husband watched it before me and got me into it. That and A Walk to Remember. So yeah, he will put those movies on because he wants to. Although, I did introduce him to The Ugly Truth, and now he loves that one, too.
LOL Okay, okay… See? You just proved my point.
That’s why painting with a broad brush is a bad idea!
However, this line: “Sure men and women are differnent in a lot of ways, but we’re all human” also proved my point.
Romance isn’t a male or female phenomenon any more than horror or the pull of space or the thrill of exploration. And the sooner we all get on board with that idea, the better the chances that we can get past this ridiculous battle of the sexes and on to things that really matter.
Thanks for dropping by, Lorraine! I’ve missed y’all!
I’ve missed you guys, too.
That’s what I was trying to say; that romance isn’t a male or female thing. It’s a human thing. And my hubby was the perfect example. Oh, and I love shoot-em-up action movies.
LOL I know a lot of women who’d rather watch horror or shoot ‘em ups than “fluffy” movies, and a lot of guys who are just the opposite. Me? Gimme George Carlin and Katt Williams, liberally sprinkled with French and Spanish movies like the works of Pedro Almodovar. (Watched Volver a while back. If you can deal with the subtitles and the accents, which sound considerably different than the Mexican Spanish I’m accustomed to, it’s a really good story.)
I’ll be keeping this post up until Friday afternoon at 5 EST. Then I’ll pick the winner, to give people plenty of time to respond.
Can’t wait to see what else comes down!
Great post J.S.
You know, I usually decide to read a romance story on the excerpt. The sex of the author never comes into my decision. If I like an author I’ll read all their work.
Many people don’t know what sex I am but they still buy my books.
However, I have seen first hand the anti-male romance author propaganda on some loops, and it disgusts me. To be honest all the male authors I’ve had the privileged to know, have written some of the best romances I’ve read….and I read a lot.
Hi, HC!!! *tackle hugs*
I think steps are being made in the right direction, but there are still far too many academics and critics who are willing to dismiss male romance authors out of hand. One jarring example I just ran across was this quote from Daisy Goodwin of BBC4 in the UK: “‘You can’t have a really seriously romantic book written by a man,’ she says, dismissing in a sentence the murmuring hearts of half humankind. If you’re a male writer, Daisy goes on, you lack insight into the ways of women.” — London Telegraph, 14 Sep 2006
Seems to me I missed that memo. Oh, well…guess I’ll just have to write another book or seven!
Great to see you, lady! You need to come around the bar more!
For men to be more romantic, they need to listen to women, and see things from the woman’s side.
Hi, Robert!
Of course they do. I think the underlying problem is that men are afraid that if they try to see things from a woman’s perspective, they’ll suddenly develop a taste for lavender drapes, track lighting, and Justin Bieber. (Yes, I’m aware all of these are stereotypes of the worst possible kind, and no, they should not be taken as opinions or attitudes I personally hold.) Until men get the hell over themselves and realize that seeing things from someone else’s point of view doesn’t automatically make them weak or unmanly, I don’t see things changing. Still, does that mean we shouldn’t try?
Thanks for dropping by!
You’re welcome.
Once in a class I wrote a piece that two thought women was written by a woman.
I feel we all need to get over ourselves and just be.
We should always strive to see all sides to life and people.
You just like the fact the $5 towel is a couple of inches shorter than the circumference of the woman, right?
AMBER!!!!! *huge hug*
But of course! I never said I didn’t have ulterior motives, but I stand by my previous assertion on the grounds stated. What’s the sense in buying $300 worth of silky, satiny frippery that’s only going to wind up puddled on the floor three seconds after a woman puts it on if she looks even remotely decent in it?
I tend to regard those sorts of things kinda like Christmas wrapping: far more important for what they conceal than for how pretty they themselves look. Besides, anything that might give me a little extra peek is something I heartily approve of.
Good to see you!